tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7713282434144514700.post4831635897639943896..comments2023-10-02T15:01:43.213+01:00Comments on Chilcot's Cheating Us: The Death of Dr. David Kelly - Important technical questions about the knife, wound etcAndrew Watthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03829322263100808179noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7713282434144514700.post-56905768997392803172011-04-12T20:59:58.038+01:002011-04-12T20:59:58.038+01:00A blogger A Day in Paradise on 29 Jan 2004 asked t...A blogger <a rel="nofollow">A Day in Paradise</a> on 29 Jan 2004 asked the following pertinent question under the heading<br /><b>Hutton Reports “No Third Party Involved in Kelly Suicide”<br />Britain: Hutton inquiry whitewashes Blair government over Iraq war</b><br /><br /><i>However, much Lord Hutton paid, it was money WELL spent… not that anyone really believes that the BBC is evil and the Government/MoD are blameless.<br /><br />One thing I had a hard time with was his “There was no third party involved with Dr. Kelly’s suicide” statement. What we wanted to know was if there was a second party involved???</i>felixhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12363991252776819712noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7713282434144514700.post-15347842720020411072011-04-12T17:42:44.962+01:002011-04-12T17:42:44.962+01:00A blogger A Day in Paradise put it very nicely and...A blogger <a href="http://www.wormus.com/aaron/stories/2004/01/29/hutton-reports-no-third-party-involved-in-kelly-suicide.html#postcomment" rel="nofollow">A Day in Paradise</a> put it very nicely and succinctly on 29 Jan 2004:<br /><i>"One thing I had a hard time with was [Lord Hutton's] “There was no third party involved with Dr. Kelly’s suicide” statement. What we wanted to know was if there was a second party involved???"</i><br /><br /><br />My own personal feeling is that a second party was involved in the death of Dr Kelly and that Nicholas Hunt was leaned on by a third party in this curious case.felixhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12363991252776819712noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7713282434144514700.post-40312653830447828082011-04-12T14:41:26.911+01:002011-04-12T14:41:26.911+01:00It seems to me that either Dr Hunt was "assis...It seems to me that either Dr Hunt was "assisted" by others in coming to his conclusion of suicide or that his thoughts on the incisions to the left wrist were of a most cursory kind.<br /><br />But of course it wasn't just Dr Hunt's conclusions that merit criticism but the fact that Lord Hutton failed to make any objective analysis of them. The forensic pathologist has spoken, therefore what he has said is right.<br /><br />It would seem, although we haven't had sight of his original report, that Dr Hunt had decided by 19th July if not earlier that Dr Kelly had committed suicide. This then before Mr Green's 50 or so tests had been carried out and, it appears, the lack of fingerprints became apparent.<br /><br />I can only conclude that Dr Hunt was being dishonest or was totally incompetent. On the basis of what Andrew has provided in analysis in this post and previously it is abundantly clear that the suicide conclusion is not a safe one.brian in the tamar valleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13475701925894027724noreply@blogger.com