Henry Porter writes in the Observer of 1st February 2004 an article with the memorable title, Are we all mad, or is it Hutton?, which I've borrowed in the title of this post.
It's an interesting read since it's contemporary.
Henry Porter draws attention to some glaring inconsistencies between the evidence Hutton heard and his conclusions.
Personally, my conclusion is not that Hutton was mad. My view is that he was corrupt.