The relevant text is from the afternoon of Tuesday 2nd September 2003 at page 94:
7 MR DINGEMANS: Professor Hawton, please.
8 PROFESSOR KEITH EDWARD HAWTON (sworn)
9 Examined by MR DINGEMANS
10 Q. Can you tell his Lordship your full name?
11 A. Keith Edward Hawton.
Is this simply an error by the stenographer?
Or is Professor Hawton uniquely liable to perjury charges should, hypothetically, his evidence to the Hutton Inquiry be demonstrated to be untrue in some material respect(s)?